Thursday, October 14, 2004

How To Do Radio

How To Do Radio

Radio Journalism 101

Want to work in Radio and need help getting started?

Want to suggest a story for NPR?

The Poynter Institute of Journalism site advertises itself as "Everything you need to be a better journalist". Highlights include an excellent and comprehensive High School Journalism Guide, and Nelson, an excellent search engine that searches by Newspapers, Print/TV, Beats or Journalism Organizations.

The Radiocollege.org site has excellent articles and suggestions on how to get your career off the ground, learn more about what you are doing or even find a school of Journalism to attend. Looking for scholarship money? There are quite a few organizations that offer such opportunities.

At AIRMedia.org you can join an organization made up of dedicated professionals who make a living (!!!) doing the kinds of stories public radio is known for.

Want to report for the BBC? They have a huge site dedicated to training and development.

The Minidisc Community Portal features links, forums, mailing lists, cool uses, etc.

Transom.org Tools editor Jeff Towne has gone through the transom discussion boards and created a list of FAQs.

NPR Technical Advisor Flawn Williams answers all your audio questions in our Ask The Engineer section. Caution: some of this may be redundant or you may find slightly differing opinions. You should read for similarities, not difference of opinion.

http://www.npr.org/about/nextgen/howto/index.html

Will Satellite, 'Podcasting' Bring a Renaissance to Radio Journalism?

Will Satellite, 'Podcasting' Bring a Renaissance to Radio Journalism?

Build your own radio station

While satellite radio will always have limited appeal due to the monthly charge, podcasting offers a free way for you to create your own radio station on the fly each day, listening when you want. Satellite radio services have been loathe to allow people to record their programs due to copyright concerns. XM Radio threatened legal action against the maker of TimeTrax software, which lets users record satellite shows on MP3s.

But Reuters reported that XM is planning its own TiVo-like devices soon that will allow users to pause and rewind live satellite broadcasts. Plus XM has a deal for streaming its programming onto the next generation of TiVo television recorders.

Still, podcasting goes much further, giving listeners full control over what they listen to, depending on the available RSS feeds. Basically, you need a portable MP3 player -- not necessarily an iPod -- Apple's free iTunes software, and the new iPodder software. The latter is an open source application, birthed by Adam Curry, the former MTV VJ, blogger and serial entrepreneur now based in Amsterdam.

Curry runs the iPodder site, which includes a nascent directory of podcasting feeds with everything from music to news to audiobooks. So far, the selection is weighted to technology radio shows, and it sometimes seems as if a small group of people are just listening to each other.

"So this morning, here in my hotel room, I listened to the latest edition of Adam Curry's Daily Source Code, Dave Winer's Morning Coffee Notes about the open-sourcing of Frontier, and a conversation between Adam and Dave about all the above, iPodder, Trade Secrets Radio and much more," wrote Doc Searls in his Weblog about his new fascination with podcasting.

But Curry is optimistic that podcasting will catch on with a much wider audience. He thinks MP3 player manufacturers will be able to build iPodder functionality right into their devices. "Mass appeal is likely, since the installed base of MP3 players is huge," he said. "Most of them have gigabytes of empty disk space and users are apparently really enjoying this new use for their players."

Beyond the smaller productions, there are now more polished podcasts from public radio station WGBH as well as KOMO 1000 AM news in Seattle. KOMO is the first commercial news station to take the leap into podcasting. The station's assistant director of news and programming, Stan Orchard, told me that his station has always been on the cutting edge with technology, launching a Web site in 1994 and an RSS feed last year. Podcasting was an easy addition.

"For the user it's easy-squeasy," Orchard said via e-mail. "They just install iPodder or some other such program and type in our podcast feed URL. That's it. As for setting it up at this end...all it takes is a RSS feed which we already had. We just had to tweak it a bit. Then we had to crank out some stories. Again, we were already doing that for the Web site so it wasn't much [work]."

One of the challenges for KOMO was getting the radio reporters to think a little differently, according to Orchard. Now they have to consider three formats while producing a story: the radio broadcast, the MP3 podcast and a written story for the Web site.


While podcasting is only in its embryonic stage, people are already looking beyond time-shifted radio on portable MP3 players. NPR's Mitchell, for one, thinks that ubiquitous wireless Net connections could bring on-demand radio to a variety of devices, cutting out the computer as content server.

"The next big thing is...I think eventually you'll be able to wirelessly download something, stick on some headphones, and sit with your iPod or phone and listen to a program," Mitchell said. "I think you'll eventually be able to do that. Handheld devices will keep shrinking. You can already download and listen to shows online."

Plus, Mitchell notes just how cheap radio production has become. Now a college student can spend about $1,000 on audio equipment, maybe $2,000 on an Apple laptop, and with the right training, start reporting stories and put them online. "I don't have to burn CDs unless someone wants to purchase it," Mitchell says. "It's extremely cost effective. All the barriers are coming down. It's becoming extremely decentralized."

For the independent radio producer, the biggest barrier might be getting heard above the noise of so many like-minded folks online. Adam Curry says that skill, experience and talent will still set people apart. "There will be a lot of crap, and just like Weblogs, we'll also have our superstars," he said. "And everyone can have their 15 minutes [of fame]."

http://ojr.org/ojr/glaser/1097614994.php

Test Web pages in multiple browser versions

Until recently, having multiple versions of IE for Windows installed on a single computer has been problematic because of the tight integration of IE with the Windows operating system. Conventional wisdom was that you couldn't have more than one version of IE installed in a given copy of Windows.

As a result, many Web builders resorted to using several separate Windows computers for testing, each with a different version of IE installed. The only other option was to create multiple virtual machines on one hardware box using emulation software such as VMware.

And now a solution
In response to the Eolas lawsuit, Microsoft is circulating a developer's preview of a version of IE without the features that are covered by the Eolas patent. One of the most interesting things about the test version of IE is that it can coexist with a standard version of IE. (Read about the changes in IE as a result of the Eolas suit.)

Joe Maddalone, of Insert Title Web Designs, is credited with realizing which file (iexplore.exe.local) makes it possible to run more than one copy of IE and sharing that discovery with the rest of us. Another enterprising Web builder, Ryan Parman of Skyzyx.com, has packaged the iexplore.exe.local file with the core browser files for each of several versions of IE. These stand-alone versions of IE are available from his download page.

To install one of the stand-alone IE versions, you simply extract the files from the ZIP archive and place them in a separate directory on your Windows test system. (Almost any directory except the main IE directory will do.) To launch the stand-alone old browser, open the directory and double-click the iexplore.exe file.

http://builder.com.com/5100-6371_14-5157896.html?tag=nl.e601

Wednesday, October 13, 2004

Microsoft warns of 22 new security flaws | Tech News on ZDNet

Microsoft warns of 22 new security flaws | Tech News on ZDNet:
"Microsoft on Tuesday published 10 software security advisories, warning Windows users and corporate administrators of 22 new flaws that affect the company's products. "

The advisories, and patches published with the bulletins, range from an "important" flaw affecting only Microsoft Windows NT Server to a collection of eight security holes, including three rated "critical," that leave Internet Explorer open to attack. Microsoft's highest severity rating for software flaws is its "critical" ranking, while "important" is considered slightly less severe.

One flaw, in Microsoft Excel, even affects Apple Computer's Mac OS X.

The abundance of flaws could leave corporate PCs vulnerable to attack if administrators are not able to patch quickly. A similar situation occurred in April, when Microsoft published seven advisories detailing 20 flaws. While one security hole stood out among those 20--and led to the widespread Sasser worm--there are no standouts in the current gaggle of goofs.

"Our challenge is trying to guess what the criminals are going to attack," said Stephen Toulouse, security program manager for Microsoft's security response team. "The guidance we are giving in general is to treat the critical ones first."

A single computer would not be vulnerable to all the flaws, Toulouse added.

Oliver Friedrichs, senior director of Symantec's security response center, said three vulnerabilities could lead to a Sasser-like worm, but the danger is lessened by the fact that the vulnerable services are not started by default on most versions of Windows. These flaws are related to three network protocols that are not generally activated on Windows computers: Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP), Network News Transfer Protocol (NNTP), and Network Dynamic Data Exchange (NetDDE).

"Blaster and Sasser targeted core system vulnerabilities, where if you didn't have the patch you were vulnerable," Friedrichs said. "The key thing here is that these are not (generally) enabled by default.The question is how large is the deployment of vulnerable systems."

http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-5406550.html